Surveillance Tech & Civil Liberties — 2026-09-21

Surveillance Watch

CBP facial recognition targeting of OnlyFans creators. Customs and Border Protection has not denied using facial recognition to target foreign OnlyFans models, amid what Reason describes as a confusing and opaque approach by the immigration system to foreigners who have done sex work.

DHS AI surveillance and the "human in the loop" fallacy. DHS avoids classifying AI tools as high-risk by arguing that a human reviews the AI's output — a defense that rests on a fallacy, according to Emily Froude writing in Tech Policy Press.

Analysis

The CBP story is the week's most significant civil liberties development. The agency's refusal to deny facial recognition use against foreign OnlyFans creators highlights how government surveillance tools can be deployed against already-marginalized groups with little transparency or legal constraint. It compounds a broader structural problem: the U.S. still has zero federal laws governing how police use facial recognition technology, and the Facial Recognition Act of 2025 (H.R. 4695) remains stalled in committee.

In parallel, the DHS "human review" argument shows how agencies sidestep accountability for AI-assisted surveillance — the mere presence of a human reviewer does not neutralize AI bias or prevent rubber-stamping of algorithmic outputs.

Rights Action

• Support efforts to regulate government facial recognition use — organizations like Ban the Scan campaign against biometric surveillance in New York City and State.
• Track federal legislation: the Facial Recognition Act of 2025 (H.R. 4695) and the Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026, which proposes Fourth Amendment protections against government purchases of Americans' private data from brokers, both depend on public pressure to move.
• Follow legal resources like EPIC's state facial recognition policy tracker to learn what restrictions exist in your state.